Skip navigation

U.S. v. Crisp, No. 01-4953 (4th Cir.) (324 F.3d 261) (March 31, 2003) (Judge Robert Bruce King)

The defendant in this case was convicted of an armed bank robbery in North Carolina; and he was sentenced to 356 months in prison. He appealed, arguing that his trial was tainted because the Government’s presentation of inadmissible expert testimony on both fingerprint evidence and handwriting evidence. Specifically, he charged ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login