McMillan v. Jarvis, No. 02-6266 (4th Cir.) (332 F.3d 244) (June 12, 2003) (Judge William B. Jr. Traxler)
Loaded on May 1, 2003
published in Punch and Jurists
May 26, 2003
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Dismissal.
Here the Court held that the notification requirement in Hill v. Braxton, 277 F.3d 701 (4th Cir. 2002), requiring a federal habeas court to notify a pro se petitioner that his petition is subject to dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d) when the state has not yet filed a responsive ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Overton v. Bazzetta, No. 02-94 (U.S. Supreme Court) (539 U.S. 126; 123 S.Ct. 2162) (June 16, 2003) (Justice Kennedy)
- Small v. U.S., No. 03-750 (U.S. Supreme Court) (544 U.S. 385; 125 S.Ct. 1752) (April 26, 2005) (Justice Breyer)
- U.S. v. Graham, No. 02-1575 (6th Cir.) (327 F.3d 460) (April 28, 2003) (Judge Karen Nelson Moore)
- U.S. v. Joaquin, No. 01-3134 (D.C. Cir.) (326 F.3d 1287) (May 2, 2003) (Judge David S. Tatel)
- U.S. v. Tinoso, No. 02-10128 (9th Cir.) (327 F.3d 864) (April 25, 2003) (Judge A. Wallace Tashima)
- U.S. v. Booe, No. 1:02-CR-135 (E.D.Tenn.) (252 F.Supp.2d 584) (March 19, 2003) (Judge Curtis L. Collier)
- Griffin v. U.S., No. 01-3818 (6th Cir.) (330 F.3d 733) (June 4, 2003) (Judge Avern Levin Cohn)
- U.S. v. Correa-Gomez, No. 01-6542 (6th Cir.) (328 F.3d 297) (May 9, 2003) (Judge Allen E. Norris)
- U.S. v. Montalvo, No. 01-17046 (9th Cir.) (331 F.3d 1052) (June 9, 2003) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Cranley, No. 02-CR-222 (E.D.Wisc.) (250 F.Supp.2d 1037) (March 10, 2003) (Judge Lynn S. Adelman)
- U.S. v. Bailey, No. 02-3187 (10th Cir.) (327 F.3d 1131) (April 25, 2003) (Judge Stephen H. Anderson)
- Center for Natl. Security Studies v. U.S.D.O.J., No. 02-5254 (D.C. Cir.) (331 F.3d 918) (June 17, 2003) (Judge David B. Sentelle)
- McMillan v. Jarvis, No. 02-6266 (4th Cir.) (332 F.3d 244) (June 12, 2003) (Judge William B. Jr. Traxler)
More from these topics:
- No Dismissal for San Diego Jail Medical Contractor from Suit Filed Over Detainee’s Withdrawal Death, Aug. 15, 2024. Drug/Alcohol Withdrawal, Private Contractors, Drug Overdose, Medical Neglect/Malpractice, Dismissal.
- Fourth Circuit: South Carolina Prisoner’s Bivens Claim Must Detail Unconstitutional Acts of Each Defendant, April 26, 2024. Complaints, Civil Rights Actions or Offenses/Bivens Actions, Dismissal.
- Ninth Circuit Says Federal Prisoner in California May Have Bivens Claim for Delays in Medical Care Allegedly to Cover Up Assault by BOP Guard, April 1, 2024. Retaliation for Filing Grievances, Failure to Protect (General), Guard Brutality/Beatings, Pepper Spray/Tear Gas, Dismissal, Medical Treatment/Expenses.
- Second Circuit Strips Qualified Immunity from Connecticut Officials Who Ignored Prisoner’s Scalp Lesions, Jan. 1, 2024. Skin, Failure to Treat, Infections, Qualified Immunity, Medical Expenses/Treatment, Dismissal, Deliberate Indifference.
- Seventh Circuit Revives Indiana Prisoner’s Claim Over Dismissed Grievance, Dec. 1, 2023. Grievances, Dismissal.
- Eleventh Circuit Says Florida Prisoner’s Dismissed Complaint Doesn’t Count as a “Strike”, Dec. 1, 2023. Complaints, Dismissal, Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), Three Strike Litigants.
- Eighth Circuit Says Judge Dismissing Claim of Federal Prisoner in Arkansas Was Premature in Counting It a PLRA ‘Strike’, Nov. 30, 2022. PLRA, Dismissal.
- Eleventh Circuit Says No PLRA ‘Strike’ for Dismissal of Case Removed From State to Federal Court, Nov. 30, 2022. PLRA, Dismissal.
- Ninth Circuit Terminates Idaho Prison Conditions Lawsuit After 40 Years of Litigation, Sept. 30, 2022. Medical, Conditions of Confinement, Overcrowding, Rehabilitation/Recidivism, Dismissal, Class Actions.
- Sixth Circuit Revives Tennessee Detainee’s Suit, Holds Lower Court Not Required to Retain Jurisdiction of State Law Claims After Dismissing Federal Claims, June 1, 2022. Appeals/Appellate Jurisdiction, Dismissal, Intentional Tort Exception.