Skip navigation

McMillan v. Jarvis, No. 02-6266 (4th Cir.) (332 F.3d 244) (June 12, 2003) (Judge William B. Jr. Traxler)

Here the Court held that the notification requirement in Hill v. Braxton, 277 F.3d 701 (4th Cir. 2002), requiring a federal habeas court to notify a pro se petitioner that his petition is subject to dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d) when the state has not yet filed a responsive ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login