Skip navigation

Sepulveda v. U.S., No. 01-2755 (1st Cir.) (330 F.3d 55) (May 29, 2003) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)

Here the Court held that the Apprendi rule has no retroactive effect on cases on collateral review; and that Apprendi does not fit within one of the "hen's-teeth rare" exceptions established under Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989).

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login