Skip navigation

U.S. v. Montalvo, No. 01-17046 (9th Cir.) (331 F.3d 1052) (June 9, 2003) (Per Curiam)

Here, while the Court agreed that the defendant was entitled to challenge his CCE conviction based on a retroactive application of Richardson v. U.S., the error that occurred was harmless based on the Court's "sensitive judgment" of the evidence.

In the annals of crazy drug sentences, few defendants …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login