Skip navigation

U.S. v. Montalvo, No. 01-17046 (9th Cir.) (331 F.3d 1052) (June 9, 2003) (Per Curiam)

Here, while the Court agreed that the defendant was entitled to challenge his CCE conviction based on a retroactive application of Richardson v. U.S., the error that occurred was harmless based on the Court's "sensitive judgment" of the evidence.

In the annals of crazy drug sentences, few defendants seeking to ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login