Skip navigation

Harper v. Vaughn, No. Civ. No. 98-728 (E.D.Pa.) (272 F.3d 527) (July 23, 2003) (Judge Jan E. Dubois)

This case is noted for its timely review of the three different approaches taken by the federal courts on the question of whether a Rule 60(b) motion to vacate a judgment denying habeas relief is considered a second or successive habeas petition.

The petitioner in this case sought relief, pursuant ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login