U.S. v. McCain, No. CR 01-0344 MHP (N.D.Cal.) (271 F.Supp.2d 1187) (July 9, 2003) (Judge Marilyn H. Patel)
Loaded on Oct. 1, 2003
published in Punch and Jurists
October 06, 2003
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Warrants - Requirements/Scope/Exceptions.
Here the Court held that a warrant affidavit, which suggested that the probable cause information was received from a “confidential reliable source” when it actually came from a wiretap was so misleading as to be a reckless disregard for the truth.
The defendant in this case, Aisha McCain, was charged ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Ray, No. CR 02-55-M-DWM (D.Mont.) (273 F.Supp.2d 1160) (July 29, 2003) (Judge Donald W. Molloy)
- U.S. v. DeJesus, No. 02-1394 (3rd Cir.) (347 F.3d 500) (October 17, 2003) (Judge Julio M. Fuentes)
- U.S. v. Dowdell, No. Crim.A.3:02CR00107 (W.D.Va.) (272 F.Supp.2d 583) (July 23, 2003) (Judge James H. Jr. Michael)
- U.S. v. McCain, No. CR 01-0344 MHP (N.D.Cal.) (271 F.Supp.2d 1187) (July 9, 2003) (Judge Marilyn H. Patel)
- U.S. v. Kim, No. 03 Cr. 413 (RPP) (S.D.N.Y.) (2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18637) (October 21, 2003) (Judge Robert P. Jr. Patterson)
- Bedenfield v. Schultz, No. 01 C 7013 (N.D.Ill.) (272 F.Supp.2d 753) (July 18, 2003) (Judge Elaine E. Bucklo)
- U.S. v. Curbelo, No. 02-4194 (4th Cir.) (343 F.3d 273) (September 11, 2003) (Judge Carolyn Dineen King)
- U.S. v. Shryock, No. 97-50458 (9th Cir.) (342 F.3d 948) (September 4, 2003) (Judge Stephen S. Trott)
- Harper v. Vaughn, No. Civ. No. 98-728 (E.D.Pa.) (272 F.3d 527) (July 23, 2003) (Judge Jan E. Dubois)
- U.S. v. Wilson, No. H-82-139 (S.D.Tex.) (289 F.Supp.2d 801) (October 27, 2003) (Judge Lynn N. Hughes)
- U.S. v. Perkins, No. 02-15891 (11th Cir.) (348 F.3d 965) (October 22, 2003) (Judge Rosemary Barkett)
More from these topics:
- First Circuit Holds No Emergency-Aid Exception to Warrant Requirement Where Police Have Information That Subject Is Already Deceased, Feb. 15, 2025. Emergency Aid Doctrine, Police/Govt Misconduct, Warrants - Requirements/Scope/Exceptions, Statements By a Deceased Person.
- Nevada Supreme Court Announces Incorporated Probable Cause Affidavit Cannot Broaden Scope of Warrant’s Description of Places and Persons to be Searched or Items to Be Seized, Dec. 1, 2024. Probable/Proximate Cause, Warrants - Requirements/Scope/Exceptions.
- Delaware Supreme Court: Counsel Ineffective for Failing to Challenge Search of Cellphone Where Consent Was Ambiguous and Warrant Constituted a General Warrant, Nov. 1, 2024. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Searches - Cellphones/Computers/Internet, Warrants - Requirements/Scope/Exceptions.
- Oregon Supreme Court Clarifies Mansor Ruling for Search Warrants for Digital Data and Announces Framework for Suppression When Warrant Contains Both Constitutional and Unconstitutional Search Categories, Oct. 1, 2023. Particularity Requirement, Electronic Surveillance, Warrants - Requirements/Scope/Exceptions.
- State Attorneys General Fear New FedEx and UPS Shipping Policies Will Allow the Feds to Bypass Warrant Requirements by Creating a Private Gun Registry, Dec. 13, 2022. Warrantless Searches, Warrants - Requirements/Scope/Exceptions, Guns - Type of.
- Georgia Supreme Court Declares ‘Relevance’ Not Legal Standard for Suppression Determination Where Items Seized Outside Scope of Warrant, Clarifies Plain View Doctrine Proper Standard, and Overrules McBee, Walsh Line of Cases, Feb. 15, 2022. Suppression of Evidence, Searches - Plain View, Warrants - Requirements/Scope/Exceptions.
- Reverse Location Warrants Neglect Particularity Requirement, May 15, 2021. Electronic Surveillance, Warrants - Requirements/Scope/Exceptions.
- Georgia Supreme Court Affirms Right to Resist Unlawful Arrest and Announces Right Includes Use of Proportionate Force Against Government Property, Dec. 15, 2020. Warrants - Requirements/Scope/Exceptions, Wrongful Use of Force.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.