U.S. v. VanHorn, No. 02-3687 (8th Cir.) (344 F.3d 729) (October 1, 2003) (Judge David R. Hansen)
The defendant in this case argued that the district court abdicated its judicial function under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996, 18 U.S.C. ยง 3664, by setting the restitution schedule in accordance with Bureau of Prison policies. A majority of the panel disagreed. It wrote:
"We disagree. The district ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login