Florida v. Jimeno, No. 90-622 (U.S. Supreme Court) (500 U.S. 248; 111 S.Ct. 1801) (May 23, 1991) (Justice Rehnquist)

Loaded on Sept. 14, 2003

Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Consent.

Here the Court held that the Fourth Amendment is not violated when, after a person gives a consent to search his car, they open a closed container found within the car that might reasonably hold the object of the search.

The petitioner, the State of Florida, sought review of the …

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from these topics:

Ninth Circuit Announces Adoption of ‘Premises Rule’ for Co-Tenant Consent-to-Search Analysis, Holds Co-Tenant’s Consent Invalid Where Defendant Instructed Co-Tenant Not to Allow Police Entry in Their Presence, May 15, 2024. Consent, Third-party Consent, Consent Searches, Third Party Consent.
DEA and Police Use Pretense of Consent Searches to Effectively Steal Cash From Airport Travelers, March 15, 2024. Racial Profiling, Consent, False Inducement, Police/Govt Misconduct.
Maryland Supreme Court Announces Expectation of Privacy Covers Electronic Data, Not Physical Devices, Thus War-rantless Search of Government’s Copy of Defendant’s Hard Drive After Consent Revoked Violated Fourth Amendment, Jan. 15, 2024. Consent, Cell-Phone Location/Tracking Data, Digital Devices, Privacy Act/Rights.
New Jersey Supreme Court: Third-Party’s Apparent Authority to Consent to Search Premises Does Not Extend to Defendant’s Personal Property Located on Premises, Sept. 1, 2023. Consent, Consent Searches.
Wyoming Supreme Court: Preventing Door From Slamming in Face of Police Officer Does Not Constitute Implied Consent to Enter Home Without a Warrant, Nov. 15, 2022. Police, Consent, Warrantless Searches.
It’s Time to Reconsider Consent Searches, May 15, 2021. Consent.
Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.