Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Schnepper, No. CR. 02-00062 ACK (D.Hawai'I) (302 F.Supp.2d 1170) (January 13, 2004) (Judge Alan Cooke Kay)

Loaded on April 1, 2004 published in Punch and Jurists April 05, 2004
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Constitutional Challenges.

This decision is noted for its discussion and rejection of three identical consolidated motions filed by defendants in three unrelated cases in Hawaii who, following their convictions for various crimes, challenged the constitutionality of the Sentencing Guidelines as amended by the Feeney Amendment. The identical motions were labeled “Motion to ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. White v. Scibana, No. 03-C-581-C (W.D.Wisc.) (314 F.Supp.2d 834) (April 23, 2004) (Judge Barbara B. Crabb)
  2. U.S. v. Romero, No. 03-4266 (10th Cir.) (360 F.3d 1248) (March 9, 2004) (Judge Stephanie K. Seymour)
  3. U.S. v. Parra, No. 02 CR. 348(PKL) (S.D.N.Y.) (302 F.3d 226) (January 21, 2004) (Judge Peter K. Leisure)
  4. U.S. v. Schnepper, No. CR. 02-00062 ACK (D.Hawai'I) (302 F.Supp.2d 1170) (January 13, 2004) (Judge Alan Cooke Kay)

More from these topics: