Skip navigation

U.S. v. Tarbox, No. 03-1339 (1st Cir.) (361 F.3d 664) (March 22, 2004) (Per Curiam)

Defendant had been ordered to pay restitution as part of his sentence for violating 18 U.S.C.S. ยง 1920. Following a dispute with the restitution schedule, the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island denied his motion disputing restitution payments and ordered that defendant's pension payments be used ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login