Skip navigation

U.S. v. Tarbox, No. 03-1339 (1st Cir.) (361 F.3d 664) (March 22, 2004) (Per Curiam)

Defendant had been ordered to pay restitution as part of his sentence for violating 18 U.S.C.S. § 1920. Following a dispute with the restitution schedule, the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island denied his motion disputing restitution payments and ordered that defendant's pension payments be used …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login