U.S. v. Taveras, No. 03-2140 (1st Cir.) (380 F.3d 532) (August 17, 2004) (Judge Kermit A. Lipez)
Loaded on Aug. 1, 2004
published in Punch and Jurists
August 02, 2004
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Confrontation Clause/Rights.
This is a case in which the defendant's supervised release was revoked based entirely on the hearsay testimony of his probation officer Carmen Wallace. The First Circuit did not decide whether Crawford v. Washington applied to supervised release revocation hearing. Instead, it used an abuse of discretion standard and Rule ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Crawford, No. 01-50633 (9th Cir.) (372 F.3d 1048) (June 21, 2004) (Judge Susan P. Graber)
- U.S. v. Gonzalez-Marichal, No. 03 CR 1692 JM (S.D.Cal.) (317 F.Supp.2d 1200) (March 30, 2004) (Judge Jeffrey T. Miller)
- U.S. v. Barraza, No. 94CR0074R (S.D.Cal.) (318 F.Supp.2d 1031) (May 17, 2004) (Judge John S. Sr. Rhoades)
- U.S. v. Koch, No. 02-6278 (6th Cir.) (383 F.3d 436) (August 26, 2004) (Judge Jeffrey S. Sutton)
- U.S. v. Wilmore, No. 03-10297 (9th Cir.) (381 F.3d 868) (August 25, 2004) (Judge Donald P. Lay)
- U.S. v. Salinas, No. 03-2376 (1st Cir.) (373 F.3d 161) (June 28, 2004) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
- U.S. v. Taveras, No. 03-2140 (1st Cir.) (380 F.3d 532) (August 17, 2004) (Judge Kermit A. Lipez)
- U.S. v. Zavalza-Rodriguez, No. 03-2247 (10th Cir.) (379 F.3d 1182) (August 17, 2004) (Judge Carlos Lucero)
- U.S. v. Massino, No. CR-02-307 (NGG) (E.D.N.Y.) (319 F.Supp.2d 295) (June 1, 2004) (Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis)
- U.S. v. Kennedy, No. 02-4917 (4th Cir.) (372 F.3d 686) (June 24, 2004) (Judge J. Harvie III Wilkinson)
More from these topics:
- SCOTUS Announces Confrontation Clause Prohibits Expert Witness From Testifying About Non-Testifying Expert’s Statements Regarding Forensic Testing Performed by Non-Testifying Expert in Support of Testifying Expert’s Opinion Testimony at Trial, Jan. 15, 2025. Forensic Sciences, Fourteenth Amendment, rights, Exclusion of Witnesses at Trial, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Montana Supreme Court: Expert Witness Testimony Presented Via Two-Way Video Conferencing Technology Violates Confrontation Clause, Dec. 1, 2024. Eyewitness Testimony, Confrontation Clause/Rights, Confrontation Clause, Sentencing by Videoconferencing.
- Idaho Supreme Court Admitting Video of Child-Witness Interviews at Trial Violates Confrontation Clause, June 15, 2024. Confrontation Clause/Rights, Video/Closed Circuit TV Testimony, Video Cameras, Crawford, Testimonial Statements.
- California Court of Appeal: Confrontation Clause Violated Where Defense Prohibited From Cross-Examining Prosecution Witness About Biased Motivation and Fabrication, Jan. 15, 2024. Confrontation Clause/Rights, Cross-Examination, Witnesses - Examination of, Cooperating Witnesses, Scope of.
- Fifth Circuit: Officer’s Testimony About CI’s Controlled Buy That He Did Not Personally Witness Violates Confrontation Clause, Sept. 15, 2022. Informants, Confrontation Clause/Rights, Hearsay Evidence.
- Idaho Supreme Court: Telephonic Testimony Violated Defendant’s Sixth Amendment Right to Confrontation, June 15, 2022. Sixth Amendment, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- SCOTUS Rejects ‘Opening the Door’ Rule to Correct ‘Misleading Impression’ as Exception to Confrontation Clause Allowing Admission of Unconfronted Testimonial Hearsay, March 15, 2022. Confrontation Clause/Rights, Present Sense Impression.
- Maryland Court of Appeals Announces Standard for Whether Scientific Evidence Is ‘Testimonial’ for Confrontation Right Purposes Under Article 21 of Maryland Declaration of Rights, Nov. 15, 2021. junk science, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- The Clash Between Closed-Source Forensic Tools and the Confrontation Clause, Sept. 15, 2021. DNA Testing/Samples, junk science, Cell Site Location Information ("CSLI"), Breathalyzer Tests, EP2P Software, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Fifth Circuit Grants Habeas Relief Because Detective’s Testimony of Witness Identification of Defendant Violates Confrontation Clause, Oct. 15, 2020. Habeas Corpus, Confrontation Clause/Rights, Witnesses - Prior Statements/Testimony.