Mungo v. Duncan, No. 03-2706 (2nd Cir.) (393 F.3d 327) (December 28, 2004) (Judge Pierre N. Leval)
Loaded on Dec. 1, 2004
published in Punch and Jurists
December 13, 2004
Filed under:
Retroactivity,
Punch And Jurists.
In this case the Second Circuit held that the Supreme Court’s landmark Confrontation Clause ruling in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004) could not be applied retroactively to cases on collateral review since it did not qualify as he type of “watershed” rule that the Supreme Court envisaged in ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Afshari, No. 02-50355 (9th Cir.) (412 F.3d 1071) (June 17, 2005) (Judge Andrew J. Kleinfeld)
- U.S. v. Sipe, No. 03-40657 (5th Cir.) (388 F.3d 471) (October 15, 2004) (Judge Patrick E. Higginbotham)
- U.S. v. Clark, No. 03-60693 (5th Cir.) (389 F.3d 141) (October 21, 2004) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Blanco, No. 03-10390 (9th Cir.) (392 F.3d 382) (December 27, 2004) (Judge William A. Fletcher)
- Slutzker v. Johnson, No. 03-4046 (3rd Cir.) (393 F.3d 373) (December 29, 2004) (Judge Edward R. Becker)
- Jacklovich v. Simmons, No. 03-3227 (10th Cir.) (392 F.3d 420) (December 21, 2004) (Judge Paul J. Jr. Kelly)
- U.S. v. Lopez-Zamora, No. 03-50304 (9th Cir.) (392 F.3d 1087) (December 29, 2004) (Judge M. Margaret McKeown)
- Mungo v. Duncan, No. 03-2706 (2nd Cir.) (393 F.3d 327) (December 28, 2004) (Judge Pierre N. Leval)
- Jones v. Blanas, No. 02-17148 (9th Cir.) (393 F.3d 918) (December 27, 2004) (Judge Betty Binns Fletcher)
- U.S. v. Ghane, No. 04-1769 (8th Cir.) (392 F.3d 317) (December 20, 2004) (Judge Gerald W. Heaney)
- Morales v. Woodford, No. 99-99020 (9th Cir.) (388 F.3d 1159) (October 21, 2004) (Judge Andrew J. Kleinfeld)
- U.S. v. Johnson, No. 02-4413 (4th Cir.) (393 F.3d 466) (December 29, 2004) (Judge Clyde H. Hamilton)
- U.S. v. Green, No. Crim. No. 02-10301-NG (D.Mass.) (348 F.Supp.2d 1) (December 29, 2004) (Judge Nancy Gertner)
- U.S. v. Bad Marriage, No. 03-30404 (9th Cir.) (392 F.3d 1103) (December 30, 2004) (Judge Warren J. Ferguson)
- U.S. v. Gasim Al-Dabbi, No. 04-1053 (8th Cir.) (388 F.3d 1145) (November 12, 2004) (Judge Roger L. Wollman)
- U.S. v. Cooper, No. 03-2854 (3rd Cir.) (394 F.3d 172) (December 23, 2004) (Judge Richard L. Nygaard)
- U.S. v. Afshari, No. 02-50355 (9th Cir.) (392 F.3d 1031) (December 20, 2004) (Judge Andrew J. Kleinfeld)
More from these topics:
- Sixth Circuit Strikes Retroactive Application of Parts of Tennessee’s Sweeping Sex Offender Registration, Verification, and Tracking Law, Oct. 1, 2024. Sex Offender Registration, Retroactivity.
- Refuting the Government’s Argument Against Nonretroactive Changes in Law as Grounds for Compassionate Release, Oct. 1, 2024. Retroactivity, Guideline Amendment/Variances and Retroactivity, Compassionate Release.
- New Mexico Supreme Court Announces Marquez’s Holding That ‘Crime of Shooting at or From Motor Vehicle Cannot Be Predicate Felony Supporting Charge of Felony Murder’ Is New Substantive Rule and Applies Retroactively, Feb. 15, 2024. Retroactivity, Murder/Felony Murder.
- Ninth Circuit Announces District Courts Have Discretion to Consider Non-Retroactive Changes in Post-Sentencing Decisional Law in Assessing ‘Extraordinary and Compelling Reasons’ for Sentence Reduction, Oct. 1, 2023. Retroactivity, U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Resentencing.
- California Court of Appeal: Trial Court Erred by Concluding Senate Bill 1393 Does Not Apply to Cases Already Final on Appeal, April 15, 2023. Retroactivity.
- Sixth Circuit Announces Nonretroactive Change in Sentencing Law Is Not an ‘Extraordinary and Compelling Reason’ Warranting a Sentence Reduction under Compassionate Release Statute, Feb. 15, 2023. Retroactivity, U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Compassionate Release.
- Ohio Supreme Court: Amendment to Statute That Shifts Burden of Proof to State Regarding Self-Defense Applies to All Pending and New Trials After Effective Date, Regardless of When Alleged Crime Occurred, Sept. 15, 2022. Retroactivity, Burden of Proof.
- California Court of Appeal: Assembly Bill 124 Applies Retroactively and Includes Psychological Trauma Based Upon Mental Illness as Mitigating Factor Under § 1170(b)(6), Aug. 15, 2022. Retroactivity, Mental Health, Reliance on Psychologist's Report.
- Michigan Supreme Court Announces 2011 SORA May Not Be Retroactively Applied to Registrants Whose Offenses Predated Its Enactment Because Doing So Violates Prohibition on Ex Post Facto Laws, Feb. 15, 2022. Retroactivity, Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act.
- California Supreme Court Announces Suspended Execution of Sentence with Probation Imposed Is Not ‘Final’ so New Changes in Law Apply Retroactively on Appeal, Nov. 15, 2021. Retroactivity, Resentencing.