U.S. v. Clark, No. 03-60693 (5th Cir.) (389 F.3d 141) (October 21, 2004) (Per Curiam)
Loaded on Dec. 1, 2004
published in Punch and Jurists
December 13, 2004
In a case of first impression for the Fifth Circuit, the Court rejected the defendant’s contention that drugs held for personal use should not be used to calculate his sentence because they were not part of the conspiracy for which he was convicted. Citing similar rulings from the First, Sixth, ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Afshari, No. 02-50355 (9th Cir.) (412 F.3d 1071) (June 17, 2005) (Judge Andrew J. Kleinfeld)
- U.S. v. Sipe, No. 03-40657 (5th Cir.) (388 F.3d 471) (October 15, 2004) (Judge Patrick E. Higginbotham)
- U.S. v. Clark, No. 03-60693 (5th Cir.) (389 F.3d 141) (October 21, 2004) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Blanco, No. 03-10390 (9th Cir.) (392 F.3d 382) (December 27, 2004) (Judge William A. Fletcher)
- Slutzker v. Johnson, No. 03-4046 (3rd Cir.) (393 F.3d 373) (December 29, 2004) (Judge Edward R. Becker)
- Jacklovich v. Simmons, No. 03-3227 (10th Cir.) (392 F.3d 420) (December 21, 2004) (Judge Paul J. Jr. Kelly)
- U.S. v. Lopez-Zamora, No. 03-50304 (9th Cir.) (392 F.3d 1087) (December 29, 2004) (Judge M. Margaret McKeown)
- Mungo v. Duncan, No. 03-2706 (2nd Cir.) (393 F.3d 327) (December 28, 2004) (Judge Pierre N. Leval)
- Jones v. Blanas, No. 02-17148 (9th Cir.) (393 F.3d 918) (December 27, 2004) (Judge Betty Binns Fletcher)
- U.S. v. Ghane, No. 04-1769 (8th Cir.) (392 F.3d 317) (December 20, 2004) (Judge Gerald W. Heaney)
- Morales v. Woodford, No. 99-99020 (9th Cir.) (388 F.3d 1159) (October 21, 2004) (Judge Andrew J. Kleinfeld)
- U.S. v. Johnson, No. 02-4413 (4th Cir.) (393 F.3d 466) (December 29, 2004) (Judge Clyde H. Hamilton)
- U.S. v. Green, No. Crim. No. 02-10301-NG (D.Mass.) (348 F.Supp.2d 1) (December 29, 2004) (Judge Nancy Gertner)
- U.S. v. Bad Marriage, No. 03-30404 (9th Cir.) (392 F.3d 1103) (December 30, 2004) (Judge Warren J. Ferguson)
- U.S. v. Gasim Al-Dabbi, No. 04-1053 (8th Cir.) (388 F.3d 1145) (November 12, 2004) (Judge Roger L. Wollman)
- U.S. v. Cooper, No. 03-2854 (3rd Cir.) (394 F.3d 172) (December 23, 2004) (Judge Richard L. Nygaard)
- U.S. v. Afshari, No. 02-50355 (9th Cir.) (392 F.3d 1031) (December 20, 2004) (Judge Andrew J. Kleinfeld)
More from these topics:
- Tenth Circuit, Joining Sister Circuits, Announces ‘Personal-Use’ Drug Quantity Doesn’t Constitute ‘Relevant Conduct’ Under Guidelines § 1B1.3(a) and Sets Forth Framework for Burden of Proof Analysis, Feb. 15, 2022. Drug Quantity, Simple Possession/Personal Use versus Distribution, Relevant Conduct.
- Mississippi Supreme Court: Drug Buy Between Dealer and User Doesn’t Constitute Conspiracy to Distribute, Aug. 15, 2021. Conspiracy, Simple Possession/Personal Use versus Distribution.
- Washington Supreme Court Announces State’s Strict-Liability Drug Possession Law Is Unconstitutional, May 15, 2021. Simple Possession/Personal Use versus Distribution, Denial of Due Process.
- Fifth Circuit: Evidence of Simple Drug Possession Insufficient to Search Cellphone Photos for Evidence of Drug Trafficking, March 15, 2021. Cell-Phone Location/Tracking Data, Simple Possession/Personal Use versus Distribution.
- Tenth Circuit: Confession Involuntary Where FBI Agent Falsely Claimed to Be in Contact With Judge, and Defendant Could Shorten Sentence With Each Truthful Answer, Aug. 15, 2020. Simple Possession/Personal Use versus Distribution, Interrogation, Cooperation.
- Using Doctor-Prescribed Marijuana Could Send Some People Back to Prison, July 15, 2020. Revocation Proceedings, Simple Possession/Personal Use versus Distribution.
- Complexity and Lack of Standardization Makes Crime Statistics Less Useful, April 15, 2020. Statistics/Trends, Marijuana Laws/Issues, Simple Possession/Personal Use versus Distribution.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.