U.S. v. Redemann, No. 03-CR-71 (E.D.Wisc.) (295 F.Supp.2d 887) (December 4, 2003) (Judge Lynn S. Adelman)
Loaded on Feb. 1, 2004
published in Punch and Jurists
February 23, 2004
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Sentencing Goals/Purposes/Practices.
This case is noted for Judge Adelman’s thought-provoking analysis of a sentencing departure based on his finding that several of the primary purposes of sentencing had previously been satisfied, a factor that thus allowed mitigation of the punishmant.
As he so often does, Judge Adelman has cast light on an ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Washington, No. 3:02CR146 (JBA) (D.Conn.) (294 F.Supp.2d 246) (December 15, 2003) (Judge Janet Bond Arterton)
- U.S. v. Barresi, No. 03-1368 (2nd Cir.) (361 F.3d 666) (March 9, 2004) (Judge Amalya Lyle Kearse)
- Holloway v. Horn, No. 01-9009 (3rd Cir.) (355 F.3d 707) (January 22, 2004) (Judge Robert E. Cowen)
- U.S. v. Jaimes, No. 02-00175-03-ACK (D.Hawai'I) (297 F.Supp.2d 1554) (July 16, 2003) (Judge Alan Cooke Kay)
- Anderson v. Cornejo, No. 02-2234 (7th Cir.) (355 F.3d 1021) (January 21, 2004) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook)
- U.S. v. Pickett, No. 03-3018 (D.C. Cir.) (353 F.3d 62) (January 9, 2004) (Judge David B. Sentelle)
- U.S. v. Carter, No. 03-3045 (10th Cir.) (360 F.3d 1235) (March 8, 2004) (Judge Harris L. Hartz)
- U.S. v. Smith, No. CRIM.A.01-0263-01RMU (D.D.C.) (297 F.Supp.2d 69) (October 28, 2003) (Judge Ricardo M. Urbina)
- U.S. v. Coates, No. CRIM.00-0170 PLF (D.D.C.) (295 F.Supp.2d 11) (August 1, 2003) (Judge Paul L. Friedman)
- Benn v. Greiner, No. 98-CV-5621 (JBW) (E.D.N.Y.) (294 F.Supp.2d 354) (December 3, 2003) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein)
- U.S. v. Reyes-Campos, No. CR.03-105-N (M.D.Ala.) (293 F.Supp.2d 1252) (November 4, 2003) (Judge Myron H. Thompson)
- In Re Sentencing, No. MISC 04-0024 (JBW) (E.D.N.Y.) (2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1172) (January 20, 2004) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein)
- U.S. v. Williams, No. 03-5107 (6th Cir.) (355 F.3d 893) (December 23, 2003) (Judge Damon J. Keith)
- U.S. v. Washington, No. 01-CR-191 (E.D.Wisc.) (293 F.Supp.2d 930) (November 17, 2003) (Judge Lynn S. Adelman)
- U.S. v. Redemann, No. 03-CR-71 (E.D.Wisc.) (295 F.Supp.2d 887) (December 4, 2003) (Judge Lynn S. Adelman)
More from these topics:
- Washington Supreme Court: Judgment and Sentence Facially Invalid Based on Miscalculated Offender Score Despite Defendant’s Stipulation to Exceptional Sentence, Dec. 1, 2024. Sentencing Goals/Purposes/Practices.
- Ninth Circuit Clarifies ‘Implicit Breach’ Case Law Regarding When Government Breaches Plea Agreement by Responding to Defendant’s Request for Downward Variant Sentence, Oct. 1, 2024. Sentencing Goals/Purposes/Practices, Breach of Plea/Coop./Immunity Agreements, Breach of trust, Plea Agreements/Guilty Pleas.
- First Circuit Holds Government Breached Plea Agreement With Defendant by Failing to Explain Why It Agreed to Substantial Downward-Variant Sentence, Sept. 1, 2024. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Sentencing Goals/Purposes/Practices, Plea Agreements/Guilty Pleas.
- Third Circuit: Pennsylvania Second-Degree Aggravated Assault of a Protected Individual Not a ‘Violent Felony’ Under ACCA, Court Acknowledges ‘Bizarre Result’, Sept. 1, 2023. Sentencing Goals/Purposes/Practices, Protected Persons, Sentence Enhancements/Departures.
- Tenth Circuit Joins Other Circuits, Holding Federal Offense of Conviction, Not Underlying Conduct, Determines First Step Act Eligibility, Sept. 15, 2021. First Step Act, Sentencing Goals/Purposes/Practices.
- Massachusetts Supreme Court Announces ‘Habitual Offender’ Statute Allows for Sentence of Probation Only, March 15, 2021. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Sentencing Goals/Purposes/Practices, Sentence of Probation.
- Fourth Circuit: Erroneous Career Offender Sentence Correctable in First Step Act Resentencing, July 15, 2020. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Sentencing Goals/Purposes/Practices.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.