Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

Alaniz v. U.S., No. 02-2575 (8th Cir.) (351 F.3d 365) (December 9, 2003) (Judge David R. Hansen)

Loaded on Jan. 1, 2004 published in Punch and Jurists January 12, 2004
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Statutory Maximum.

Here, as a matter of first impression for the Eighth Circuit, the Court joined with the Second, Fourth, Sixth and Seventh Circuits in holding that a second, uncharged drug type cannot be added to the charged drug type in order to trigger a higher quantity-based statutory penalty range.

In this ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Bailey, No. 601CV875ORL22KRS (M.D.Fla.) (288 F.Supp.2d 1261) (October 22, 2003) (Judge Anne C. Conway)
  2. Alaniz v. U.S., No. 02-2575 (8th Cir.) (351 F.3d 365) (December 9, 2003) (Judge David R. Hansen)
  3. U.S. v. Moore, No. 03-CR-11 (E.D.Wisc.) (288 F.Supp.2d 955) (October 17, 2003) (Judge Lynn S. Adelman)
  4. U.S. v. Gonczy, No. 02-2399 (1st Cir.) (357 F.3d 50) (February 2, 2004) (Judge Juan R. Torruella)
  5. Medberry v. Crosby, No. 02-11072 (11th Cir.) (351 F.3d 1049) (November 25, 2003) (Judge Susan H. Black)
  6. U.S. v. Doe, No. 02-50445 (9th Cir.) (351 F.3d 929) (December 9, 2003) (Judge James C. Mahan)
  7. U.S. v. Bordon, No. 98-0427-CR-King (S.D.Fla.) (300 F.Supp.2d 1288) (January 23, 2004) (Judge James Lawrence King)

More from these topics: