Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Bordon, No. 98-0427-CR-King (S.D.Fla.) (300 F.Supp.2d 1288) (January 23, 2004) (Judge James Lawrence King)

Loaded on Jan. 1, 2004 published in Punch and Jurists January 12, 2004
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Constitutional Challenges.

Here the Court rejected a series of constitutional challenges to the Feeney Amendment, including challenges that its retroactive use violates the ex post facto clause and that the new law violates the separation of powers doctrine.

As the chorus of discontent about the Feeney Amendment get louder, we are beginning ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Bailey, No. 601CV875ORL22KRS (M.D.Fla.) (288 F.Supp.2d 1261) (October 22, 2003) (Judge Anne C. Conway)
  2. Alaniz v. U.S., No. 02-2575 (8th Cir.) (351 F.3d 365) (December 9, 2003) (Judge David R. Hansen)
  3. U.S. v. Moore, No. 03-CR-11 (E.D.Wisc.) (288 F.Supp.2d 955) (October 17, 2003) (Judge Lynn S. Adelman)
  4. U.S. v. Gonczy, No. 02-2399 (1st Cir.) (357 F.3d 50) (February 2, 2004) (Judge Juan R. Torruella)
  5. Medberry v. Crosby, No. 02-11072 (11th Cir.) (351 F.3d 1049) (November 25, 2003) (Judge Susan H. Black)
  6. U.S. v. Doe, No. 02-50445 (9th Cir.) (351 F.3d 929) (December 9, 2003) (Judge James C. Mahan)
  7. U.S. v. Bordon, No. 98-0427-CR-King (S.D.Fla.) (300 F.Supp.2d 1288) (January 23, 2004) (Judge James Lawrence King)

More from these topics: