U.S. v. Velez, No. 02-1766 (2nd Cir.) (354 F.3d 190) (January 13, 2004) (Judge Jose A. Cabranes)
Loaded on Jan. 1, 2004
published in Punch and Jurists
January 05, 2004
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Proffer Agreements/Statements/Sessions.
This decision represents the latest rejection by the courts of the frequent challenges by criminal defendants to the admissibility and use at trial of statements made by such defendants during plea bargain sessions. Rule 410 of the Fed.R.Evid. generally bars the introduction of statements made by a defendant during proffer ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Roper v. Weaver, No. 06-313 (U.S. Supreme Court) (550 U.S. 598; 127 S.Ct. 2022) (May 21, 2007) (Per Curiam)
- Fellers v. U.S., No. 02-6320 (U.S. Supreme Court) (540 U.S. 519; 124 S.Ct. 1019) (January 26, 2004) (Justice O'Connor)
- U.S. v. Maslin, No. 02-1648 (2nd Cir.) (356 F.3d 191) (January 13, 2004) (Judge Jed S. Rakoff)
- U.S. v. Chapman, No. 03-1490 (8th Cir.) (356 F.3d 843) (January 21, 2004) (Judge Morris Sheppard Arnold)
- U.S. v. Hammond, No. 01-5358 (6th Cir.) (351 F.3d 765) (December 15, 2003) (Judge Danny J. Boggs)
- Evans v. Zebulon, No. 02-16424 (11th Cir.) (351 F.3d 485) (November 18, 2003) (Judge R. Lanier III Anderson)
- Humanitarian Law Project v. Ashcroft, No. CV 03-6107 ABC (C.D.Cal.) (309 F.Supp.2d 1185) (March 17, 2004) (Judge Audrey B. Collins)
- U.S. v. Phillips, No. 02-30035 (9th Cir.) (367 F.3d 846) (January 28, 2004) (Judge Thomas G. Nelson)
- Wilson v. Czerniak, No. 02-36121 (9th Cir.) (355 F.3d 1151) (January 20, 2004) (Judge Warren J. Ferguson)
- Zucker v. Menifee, No. 03 Civ. 10077 (RJH) (S.D.N.Y.) (2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 724) (January 21, 2004) (Judge Richard J. Holwell)
- Manning v. Miller, No. 03-1762 (7th Cir.) (355 F.3d 1028) (January 21, 2004) (Judge William J. Bauer)
- Ly v. Hansen, No. 01-3016 (6th Cir.) (351 F.3d 263) (November 26, 2003) (Judge Danny J. Boggs)
- U.S. v. Saucedo-Patino, No. 03-10946 (11th Cir.) (358 F.3d 790) (January 27, 2004) (Judge Susan H. Black)
- U.S. v. Maldonado, No. 03-1739 (1st Cir.) (356 F.3d 130) (January 20, 2004) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
- U.S. v. Velez, No. 02-1766 (2nd Cir.) (354 F.3d 190) (January 13, 2004) (Judge Jose A. Cabranes)
More from these topics:
- Sixth Circuit Announces Invoking Fifth Amendment While Testifying at Trial Does Not Contradict Prior Proffer Statement Nor Does Questioning the Sufficiency of the Prosecution’s Evidence, July 1, 2025. Fifth Amendment, Sufficiency of Evidence, Prior Inconsistent Statements, Proffer Agreements/Statements/Sessions.
- Third Circuit: Despite ‘Expressly and Repeatedly’ Requesting Low-End Sentence, Government Breached Plea Agreement by Emphasizing ‘Heinous’ Nature of Offense and Presenting Victim-Impact Evidence at Sentencing Thereby Undermining Recommendation, Dec. 1, 2024. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Mitigating Role/Circumstances/Evidence, Reduction of Sentence, Proffer Agreements/Statements/Sessions.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
- U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc., No. 90-516 (U.S. Supreme Court) (500 U.S. 90; 111 S.Ct. 1711) (May 20, 1991) (Justice Marshall), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists.
- Trammel v. U.S., No. 78-5705 (U.S. Supreme Court) (445 U.S. 40; 100 S.Ct. 906) (February 27, 1980) (Justice Burger), Feb. 12, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to Assert.