U.S. v. Kincade, No. 02-50380 (9th Cir.) (379 F.3d 813) (August 18, 2004) (Judge Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain)
Loaded on July 1, 2004
published in Punch and Jurists
July 26, 2004
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
DNA Evidence/Testing.
In October 0f 2003, a divided three judge panel from the Ninth Circuit held that the forced extraction of blood from parolees pursuant to the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act (42 U.S.C. § 14135a) (the “DNA Act”) requires individualized suspicion under the Fourth Amendment, and that the compulsory collection of ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Mooney, No. 02-3380 (8th Cir.) (401 F.3d 940) (March 28, 2005) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Holbrook, No. 02-4844 (4th Cir.) (376 F.3d 259) (July 21, 2004) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Stewart, No. 03 CR.717(MGC) (S.D.N.Y.) (317 F.Supp.2d 432) (May 5, 2004) (Judge Miriam Goldman Cedarbaum)
- Kane v. Winn, No. CIV.A.03-40116-WGY (D.Mass.) (319 F.Supp.2d 162) (May 27, 2004) (Judge William G. Young)
- U.S. v. Big Apple Bag Co., Inc., No. 03-CR-781 (NGG) (E.D.N.Y.) (317 F.Supp.2d 181) (May 7, 2004) (Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis)
- Chandler v. Crosby, No. 03-12017 (11th Cir.) (379 F.3d 1278) (August 6, 2004) (Judge Gerald B. Tjoflat)
- U.S. v. Bedonie, No. 2:02-CR-00690-PGC (D.Utah) (317 F.Supp.2d 1285) (May 11, 2004) (Judge Paul G. Cassell)
- U.S. v. Stewart, No. 03 CR.717(MGC) (S.D.N.Y.) (317 F.Supp.2d 426) (May 5, 2004) (Judge Miriam Goldman Cedarbaum)
- Ramirez v. Pugh, No. 02-2101 (3rd Cir.) (379 F.3d 122) (August 12, 2004) (Judge Robert E. Cowen)
- U.S. v. Rios-Flores, No. 02-CR-632-ALL (W.D.Tex.) (318 F.Supp.2d 452) (January 21, 2003) (William Wayne Justice)
- U.S. v. Gementera, No. 03-10103 (9th Cir.) (379 F.3d 596) (August 9, 2004) (Judge Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain)
- U.S. v. Khimchiachvili, No. 03-1166(L) (2nd Cir.) (372 F.3d 75) (June 9, 2004) (Judge Edward R. Korman)
- U.S. v. Kincade, No. 02-50380 (9th Cir.) (379 F.3d 813) (August 18, 2004) (Judge Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain)
- U.S. v. Smith, No. EDCV 04-006RT (C.D.Cal.) (318 F.Supp.2d 875) (March 18, 2004) (Judge Robert J. Timlin)
- Scott v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, No. Civ. No, 04-1744 (JEI) (D.N.J.) (317 F.Supp.2d 529) (April 22, 2004) (Judge Joseph E. Irenas)
- U.S. v. Lynch, No. 02-30216 (9th Cir.) (367 F.3d 1148) (May 13, 2004) (Per Curiam)
More from these topics:
- Study: DNA Transfer in Social Settings, Feb. 15, 2025. DNA Testing/Samples, Forensic Sciences, DNA Evidence, DNA Evidence/Testing.
- Study Reveals Best DNA Recovery Spots on Drug Baggies, Feb. 15, 2025. DNA Testing/Samples, War on Drugs, DNA Evidence/Testing.
- Seeking Justice for Two: The DNA Scandal That Shook a Community, Jan. 15, 2025. DNA Testing/Samples, junk science, Wrongful Conviction, DNA Evidence/Testing.
- Touch-Transfer DNA Remains Misunderstood and Still Poses High Risk of Wrongful Conviction, Dec. 15, 2024. DNA Testing/Samples, junk science, DNA Evidence/Testing.
- Forensic Microbiology and Criminal Investigations, Sept. 1, 2024. junk science, DNA Evidence/Testing.
- Dozens of Prisoners in Colorado Notified About Potential Compromised DNA Evidence, Aug. 1, 2024. DNA Testing/Samples, junk science, DNA Evidence, DNA Evidence/Testing.
- Three’s a Crowd: Issues of DNA Mixture Analysis and Interpretation, Nov. 1, 2023. DNA Testing/Samples, junk science, DNA Evidence/Testing.
- Secondary DNA Transfer: Little Known Phenomenon That Puts You at a Crime Scene You’ve Never Visited and Places a Murder Weapon You’ve Never Touched in Your Hand, May 29, 2023. DNA Testing/Samples, junk science, DNA Evidence/Testing.
- Study Finds DNA Similarities Among Look-alikes, March 15, 2023. Racial Discrimination, Similar Acts or Crimes/Similarity in kind, DNA Evidence/Testing.
- Cops in Virginia Beach Used Fake DNA Reports During Interrogations, June 15, 2022. False Exculpatory Statements, DNA Evidence/Testing.