Oregon v. Elstad, No. 83-773 (U.S. Supreme Court) (470 U.S. 298; 105 S.Ct. 1285) (March 4, 1985) (Justice O'Connor)
In this case, the defendant made incriminating statements while in custodial interrogation prior to the issuance of Miranda warnings. The police then administered Miranda warnings, and thereafter the defendant made further incriminating statements. The issue was whether the defendants post-Mirandized statements must be suppressed as the fruit of the earlier ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login