Ponnapula v. Ashcroft, No. 03-1255 (3rd Cir.) (373 F.3d 480) (June 28, 2004) (Judge Edward R. Becker)
Loaded on June 1, 2004
published in Punch and Jurists
June 28, 2004
Filed under:
Retroactivity,
Punch And Jurists.
Appellants, the Immigration and Naturalization Service, the Department of Justice, and various federal officials, sought review of a judgment from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, which granted appellee alien's petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C.S. § 2241 after finding that ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Councilman, No. 03-1383 (1st Cir.) (373 F.3d 197) (June 29, 2004) (Judge Juan R. Torruella)
- U.S. v. Ameline, No. 02-30326 (9th Cir.) (376 F.3d 967) (July 21, 2004) (Judge Richard A. Paez)
- U.S. v. Linares, No. 03-3011 (D.C. Cir.) (367 F.3d 941) (May 18, 2004) (Judge David S. Tatel)
- U.S. v. Amberslie, No. 02 CR. 1370(JSR) (S.D.N.Y.) (312 F.Supp.2d 570) (April 2, 2004) (Judge Jed S. Rakoff)
- U.S. v. Barre, No. 03-CR-306-B (D.Colo.) (313 F.Supp.2d 1086) (April 5, 2004) (Judge Lewis T. Babcock)
- U.S. v. Combs, No. 01-5997 (6th Cir.) (369 F.3d 925) (June 4, 2004) (Judge Deborah L. Cook)
- U.S. v. Saner, No. IP-03-181-CR-M/F (S.D.Ind.) (313 F.Supp.2d 896) (April 9, 2004) (Judge Larry J. McKinney)
- Stumpf v. Mitchell, No. 01-3613 (6th Cir.) (367 F.3d 594) (April 28, 2004) (Judge Martha Craig Daughtrey)
- Ponnapula v. Ashcroft, No. 03-1255 (3rd Cir.) (373 F.3d 480) (June 28, 2004) (Judge Edward R. Becker)
- U.S. v. Mooney, No. 02-3388 (8th Cir.) (2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 15301) (July 23, 2004) (Per Curiam)
- Stauber v. The City of New York, No. 03 Civ. 9162 (RWS) (S.D.N.Y.) (2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13350) (July 16, 2004) (Judge Robert W. Sweet)
- U.S. v. Sattar, No. S1 02 395JGK (S.D.N.Y.) (314 F.Supp.2d 279) (April 20, 2004) (Judge John G. Koeltl)
More from these topics:
- Connecticut Supreme Court Announces Teague’s ‘Watershed’ Rule Exception to Nonretroactivity of New Constitutional Rule of Criminal Procedure on Collateral Review Has ‘Continued Vitality’ in Connecticut, Adoption of Third Exception to Teague’s Nonretroacti, April 15, 2025. Retroactivity, Criminal Procedure, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Eyewitness Identification.
- California Supreme Court Announces Retroactivity of 2022 Version of Penal Code § 1170 to Upper-Term Sentences Imposed Before Its Enactment, Dec. 15, 2024. Retroactivity, U.S. Sentencing Guidelines.
- Sixth Circuit Strikes Retroactive Application of Parts of Tennessee’s Sweeping Sex Offender Registration, Verification, and Tracking Law, Oct. 1, 2024. Sex Offender Registration, Retroactivity.
- Refuting the Government’s Argument Against Nonretroactive Changes in Law as Grounds for Compassionate Release, Oct. 1, 2024. Retroactivity, Guideline Amendment/Variances and Retroactivity, Compassionate Release.
- New Mexico Supreme Court Announces Marquez’s Holding That ‘Crime of Shooting at or From Motor Vehicle Cannot Be Predicate Felony Supporting Charge of Felony Murder’ Is New Substantive Rule and Applies Retroactively, Feb. 15, 2024. Retroactivity, Murder/Felony Murder.
- Ninth Circuit Announces District Courts Have Discretion to Consider Non-Retroactive Changes in Post-Sentencing Decisional Law in Assessing ‘Extraordinary and Compelling Reasons’ for Sentence Reduction, Oct. 1, 2023. Retroactivity, U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Resentencing.
- California Court of Appeal: Trial Court Erred by Concluding Senate Bill 1393 Does Not Apply to Cases Already Final on Appeal, April 15, 2023. Retroactivity.
- Sixth Circuit Announces Nonretroactive Change in Sentencing Law Is Not an ‘Extraordinary and Compelling Reason’ Warranting a Sentence Reduction under Compassionate Release Statute, Feb. 15, 2023. Retroactivity, U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Compassionate Release.
- Ohio Supreme Court: Amendment to Statute That Shifts Burden of Proof to State Regarding Self-Defense Applies to All Pending and New Trials After Effective Date, Regardless of When Alleged Crime Occurred, Sept. 15, 2022. Retroactivity, Burden of Proof.
- California Court of Appeal: Assembly Bill 124 Applies Retroactively and Includes Psychological Trauma Based Upon Mental Illness as Mitigating Factor Under § 1170(b)(6), Aug. 15, 2022. Retroactivity, Mental Health, Reliance on Psychologist's Report.