U.S. v. Patane, No. 02-1183 (U.S. Supreme Court) (542 U.S. 630; 124 S.Ct. 2620) (June 28, 2004) (Justice Thomas)
Loaded on June 1, 2004
published in Punch and Jurists
June 07, 2004
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Miranda.
In this case, the Supreme Court considered whether the failure to properly Mirandize a suspect requires the suppression of physical evidence obtained as the result of the inadmissible - though not coerced - questioning.
Samuel Patane, a convicted felon, was arrested for harassing his ex-girl friend. Federal firearms agents went ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain, No. 03-485 (U.S. Supreme Court) (542 U.S. 692; 124 S.Ct. 2739) (June 29, 2004) (Justice Souter)
- Hadix v. Johnson, No. 03-1334 (6th Cir.) (367 F.3d 513) (May 6, 2004) (Judge Cornelia G. Kennedy)
- Beard v. Banks, No. 02-1603 (U.S. Supreme Court) (542 U.S. 406; 124 S.Ct. 2504) (June 24, 2004) (Justice Thomas)
- Holland v. Jackson, No. 03-1200 (U.S. Supreme Court) (542 U.S. 649; 124 S.Ct. 2736) (June 28, 2004) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Patane, No. 02-1183 (U.S. Supreme Court) (542 U.S. 630; 124 S.Ct. 2620) (June 28, 2004) (Justice Thomas)
- U.S. v. Smith, No. 03-CR-92 (E.D.Wisc.) (311 F.Supp.2d 801) (March 30, 2004) (Judge Lynn S. Adelman)
- Rumsfeld v. Padilla, No. 03-1027 (U.S. Supreme Court) (542 U.S. 426; 124 S.Ct. 2711) (June 28, 2004) (Justice Rehnquist)
- Rasul v. Bush, No. 03-334 (U.S. Supreme Court) (542 U.S. 466; 124 S.Ct. 2686) (June 28, 2004) (Justice Stevens)
- Missouri v. Seibert, No. 02-1371 (U.S. Supreme Court) (542 U.S. 600; 124 S.Ct. 2601) (June 28, 2004) (Justice Souter)
- Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, No. 03-6696 (U.S. Supreme Court) (542 U.S. 507; 124 S.Ct. 2633) (June 28, 2004) (Justice O'Connor)
- U.S. v. Estate of Parsons, No. 01-50464 (5th Cir.) (367 F.3d 409) (April 16, 2004) (Judge Jerry E. Smith)
- Gonzalez v. Secretary for Dep't of Corrections, No. 02-12054 (11th Cir.) (366 F.3d 1253) (April 26, 2004) (Judge Edward E. Carnes)
- Blakely v. Washington, No. 02-1632 (U.S. Supreme Court) (542 U.S. 296; 124 S.Ct. 2531) (June 24, 2004) (Justice Scalia)
- Tennard v. Dretke, No. 02-10038 (U.S. Supreme Court) (542 U.S. 274; 124 S.Ct. 2562) (June 24, 2004) (Justice O'Connor)
- Ashcroft v. A.C.L.U., No. 00-1293 (U.S. Supreme Court) (535 U.S. 564; 122 S.Ct. 1700) (May 13, 2002) (Justice Thomas)
More from these topics:
- California Court of Appeal: Defendant’s Conversation With Officers Not Consensual Based on Officers’ Positioning and Manner of Approaching Legally Parked Vehicle so Evidence Obtained Resulting From Conversation Must Be Suppressed, Aug. 15, 2024. Vehicle Searches, Consensual Encounters, Suppression, Miranda.
- Eleventh Circuit Reverses District Court’s Grant of Habeas Relief, Notes It’s ‘Murky on When Putting Two Suspects in a Room Together Qualifies as Interrogation Under Miranda’, July 15, 2024. AEDPA, Miranda, Custodial Interrogations, Minors, Use of, Interrogation.
- Oregon Supreme Court Rules Police Questioning of Probationer in Probation Officer’s Secure Office Absent Miranda Warning Constitute ‘Compelling Circumstances’ and Suppresses Statements, June 15, 2024. Miranda, Custodial Interrogations, Interrogation, In Custody.
- First Circuit: Miranda Waiver Not Valid Where Interrogating Officer Answered ‘No’ to Defendant’s Question — ‘None of this can be used against me, can it?’, March 15, 2024. Miranda, Custodial Interrogations, In-home, Right To Remain Silent, Interrogation, Voluntary Nature/Voluntariness.
- The Diminishment of Miranda Is Leading to False Confessions and Conviction of Innocents, Feb. 15, 2024. Commentary/Reviews, Wrongful Conviction, Confessions - Admissibility, Impeachment Evidence/Purposes, Miranda, Interrogation, In Custody, Confessions and Statements of Defendant, Voluntary Nature/Voluntariness.
- SCOTUS: § 1983 Claim Cannot Be Based on Violation of Miranda Because Not Tantamount to Violation of Fifth Amendment, Sept. 15, 2022. Fifth Amendment, Miranda.
- New Jersey Supreme Court: Defendant Did Not Voluntarily Waive Privilege Against Self-Incrimination Because Police Persistently Contradicted and Undermined Significance of Miranda During Interrogation, Aug. 15, 2022. Police Misconduct, Custodial Interrogations/Statements, Miranda.
- Oregon Court Rules Prisoner’s Admissions in Disciplinary Hearing Violate Miranda, But Harmlessly, Aug. 1, 2022. Self Incrimination, Miranda.
- Vermont Supreme Court: Under Totality of Circumstances, Police Interview of Defendant in Store Parking Lot Was ‘Custodial Interrogation,’ Triggering Requirement for Miranda Warnings, May 1, 2022. Miranda, Custodial Interrogations.
- California Court of Appeal: Police Created Atmosphere of Custodial Interrogation Requiring Miranda Warnings Even Though Prearrest Interview Occurred in Teen Suspect’s Home, Dec. 15, 2021. Miranda, Custodial Interrogations.