Gold v. U.S., No. 137 (U.S. Supreme Court) (352 U.S. 985; 77 S.Ct. 378) (January 28, 2057) (Per Curiam)
Here, supplementing its rulings in Remmer v. U.S., the Court held that the fact that an intrusion on the jury was unintentional does not remove the effect of that intrusion; and thus it directed that a new trial be granted.
In Remmer v. U.S., 347 U.S. 227, 229 (1954) (Remmer ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login