Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Hahn, No. 01-2301 (10th Cir.) (359 F.3d 1315) (March 4, 2004) (Per Curiam)

Loaded on March 1, 2004 published in Punch and Jurists March 29, 2004
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Waiver of Appeal Rights.

Here the en banc court upheld the validity of appeal waiver provisions in general, and rejected the defendant's claim that such waivers can never be knowing and voluntary; but the Court did establish a series of criteria for examining such waivers.

By now, virtually every Circuit has accepted the premise ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Whitmore, No. 03-3022 (D.C. Cir.) (359 F.3d 609) (March 5, 2004) (Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson)
  2. U.S. v. Leon H., No. 03-30129 (9th Cir.) (365 F.3d 750) (April 16, 2004) (Judge Proctor Jr. Hug)
  3. Cone v. Bell, No. 99-5279 (6th Cir.) (359 F.3d 785) (March 1, 2004) (Judge James L. Ryan)
  4. U.S. v. Hahn, No. 01-2301 (10th Cir.) (359 F.3d 1315) (March 4, 2004) (Per Curiam)
  5. U.S. v. Prime, No. 02-30375 (9th Cir.) (363 F.3d 1028) (April 16, 2004) (Judge Stephen S. Trott)
  6. Ramirez v. Castro, No. 02-56066 (9th Cir.) (365 F.3d 755) (April 19, 2004) (Judge Kim McLane Wardlaw)
  7. U.S. v. Moussaoui, No. 03-4792 (4th Cir.) (365 F.3d 292) (April 22, 2004) (Judge William W. Jr. Wilkins)
  8. Clement v. Calif. Dept. of Corrections, No. 03-15006 (9th Cir.) (364 F.3d 1148) (April 20, 2004) (Per Curiam)
  9. Steele v. Murphy, No. 02-2213 (1st Cir.) (365 F.3d 14) (April 12, 2004) (Judge Juan R. Torruella)

More from these topics: