Skip navigation

U.S. v. Patrick V., No. 03-2138 (1st Cir.) (359 F.3d 3) (February 19, 2004) (Judge Frank M. Coffin)

Here the Court upheld a huge restitution order against a juvenile offender, after summarily dismissing his concerns that such an order was so burdensome as to be inimical with the rehabilitative purposes of the Federal Juvenile Delinquency Act.

Before reading this decision, one should read the recent op-ed commentary written ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login