Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Reyna, No. 01-41164 (5th Cir.) (358 F.3d 344) (January 26, 2004) (Judge W. Eugene Davis)

Loaded on March 1, 2004 published in Punch and Jurists March 15, 2004
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Right of Allocution.

Here, abrogating prior precedent, the en banc court held that the failure to give the defendant his Rule 32 right of allocution to speak in mitigation of his sentence, no longer requires automatic reversal, but rather is subject to plain error review.

While on supervised release for a prior offense, ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Nordyke v. King, No. 99-17551 (9th Cir.) (364 F.3d 1025) (April 5, 2004) (Per Curiam)
  2. U.S. v. Kim, No. 03-11016 (11th Cir.) (364 F.3d 1236) (March 30, 2004) (Judge Susan H. Black)
  3. U.S. v. Reyna, No. 01-41164 (5th Cir.) (358 F.3d 344) (January 26, 2004) (Judge W. Eugene Davis)
  4. U.S. v. Tanasi, No. 02 Cr. 0096 (S.D.N.Y.) (2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3331) (March 3, 2004) (Judge Robert W. Sweet)
  5. Sweeney v. Carter, No. 02-2165 (7th Cir.) (361 F.3d 327) (March 15, 2004) (Judge Diane P. Wood)
  6. U.S. v. Nunemacher, No. 02-3380 (10th Cir.) (362 F.3d 682) (March 30, 2004) (Judge Monroe G. McKay)
  7. U.S. v. Fastow, No. CRIM.A.H.-03-150 (S.D.Tex.) (300 F.Supp.2d 479) (January 27, 2004) (Judge David Hittner)
  8. U.S. v. Biheiri, No. CRIM.A. 03-365-A (E.D.Va.) (299 F.Supp.2d 590) (February 21, 2004) (Judge Thomas Selby III Ellis)
  9. U.S. v. Mateo, No. 02 CR. 668 (VM) (S.D.N.Y.) (299 F.Supp.2d 201) (January 9, 2004) (Judge Victor Marrero)

More from these topics: