Nardone v. U.S., No. 240 (U.S. Supreme Court) (308 U.S. 338; 60 S.Ct. 266) (December 11, 2039) (Justice Frankfurter)
In this case the Court emphasized that "the exclusionary rule reaches not only primary evidence obtained as a direct result of an illegal search or seizure, but also evidence later discovered and found to be derivative of an illegality or fruit of the poisonous tree." (Id., at 341). However, it ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login