Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

Jansen v. U.S., No. 02-4215 (3rd Cir.) (369 F.3d 237) (May 21, 2004) (Judge Dickinson R. Debevoise)

Loaded on May 1, 2004 published in Punch and Jurists May 03, 2004
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Simple Possession/Personal Use versus Distribution.

Robert Jansen, the appellant/inmate in this case, filed a petition for habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, alleging that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to argue at sentencing that the amount of drugs in his possession intended for personal use should not have been included …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Jansen v. U.S., No. 02-4215 (3rd Cir.) (369 F.3d 237) (May 21, 2004) (Judge Dickinson R. Debevoise)
  2. Nelson v. Campbell, No. 03-6821 (U.S. Supreme Court) (541 U.S. 637; 124 S.Ct. 2117) (May 24, 2004) (Justice O'Connor)
  3. U.S. v. Martin, No. 03-1068 (1st Cir.) (363 F.3d 25) (March 30, 2004) (Judge Kermit A. Lipez)
  4. U.S. v. Bennett, No. 02-50442 (9th Cir.) (363 F.3d 947) (April 9, 2004) (Judge Raymond C. Fisher)
  5. Thornton v. U.S., No. 03-5165 (U.S. Supreme Court) (541 U.S. 615; 124 S.Ct. 2127) (May 24, 2004) (Justice Rehnquist)

More from these topics: