Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

Jansen v. U.S., No. 02-4215 (3rd Cir.) (369 F.3d 237) (May 21, 2004) (Judge Dickinson R. Debevoise)

Loaded on May 1, 2004 published in Punch and Jurists May 03, 2004
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Simple Possession/Personal Use versus Distribution.

Robert Jansen, the appellant/inmate in this case, filed a petition for habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, alleging that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to argue at sentencing that the amount of drugs in his possession intended for personal use should not have been included in ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Thornton v. U.S., No. 03-5165 (U.S. Supreme Court) (541 U.S. 615; 124 S.Ct. 2127) (May 24, 2004) (Justice Rehnquist)
  2. U.S. v. Bennett, No. 02-50442 (9th Cir.) (363 F.3d 947) (April 9, 2004) (Judge Raymond C. Fisher)
  3. U.S. v. Martin, No. 03-1068 (1st Cir.) (363 F.3d 25) (March 30, 2004) (Judge Kermit A. Lipez)
  4. Nelson v. Campbell, No. 03-6821 (U.S. Supreme Court) (541 U.S. 637; 124 S.Ct. 2117) (May 24, 2004) (Justice O'Connor)
  5. Jansen v. U.S., No. 02-4215 (3rd Cir.) (369 F.3d 237) (May 21, 2004) (Judge Dickinson R. Debevoise)

More from these topics: