Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

Pliler v. Ford, No. 03-221 (U.S. Supreme Court) (542 U.S. 225; 124 S.Ct. 2441) (June 21, 2004) (Justice Thomas)

Loaded on May 1, 2004 published in Punch and Jurists May 31, 2004
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Stay and Abeyance Procedure.

In 1997, Richard Ford filed two pro se federal habeas petitions just five days before the statute of limitations expired. Because the claims in his petitions were “mixed” (i.e., they included claims for which he had not exhausted his state remedies), Ford also filed motions to stay the petitions while ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Green, No. Crim. No. 02-10054-WGY (D.Mass.) (346 F.Supp.2d 259) (June 18, 2004) (Judge William G. Young)
  2. U.S. v. Stephens, No. 02-14656 (11th Cir.) (365 F.3d 967) (April 6, 2004) (Judge Gerald B. Tjoflat)
  3. U.S. v. Iniguez, No. 01-50553 (9th Cir.) (368 F.3d 1113) (May 26, 2004) (Judge M. Margaret McKeown)
  4. Austin v. Wilkinson, No. 02-3429 (6th Cir.) (372 F.3d 346) (June 10, 2004) (Judge Karen Nelson Moore)
  5. Pliler v. Ford, No. 03-221 (U.S. Supreme Court) (542 U.S. 225; 124 S.Ct. 2441) (June 21, 2004) (Justice Thomas)
  6. Mataya v. Kingston, No. 02-2850 (7th Cir.) (371 F.3d 353) (June 3, 2004) (Judge Richard A. Posner)
  7. U.S. v. Hiruko, No. 03 CR 1124 (JG) (E.D.N.Y.) (320 F.Supp.2d 26) (June 9, 2004) (Judge John Gleeson)
  8. Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Ct. of Nevada, No. 03-5554 (U.S. Supreme Court) (542 U.S. 177; 124 S.Ct. 2451) (June 21, 2004) (Justice Kennedy)

More from these topics: