Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Iniguez, No. 01-50553 (9th Cir.) (368 F.3d 1113) (May 26, 2004) (Judge M. Margaret McKeown)

Loaded on May 1, 2004 published in Punch and Jurists May 31, 2004
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Total Punishment.

Here the Court joined most of the Circuits in holding that that the term “total punishment” as used in U.S.S.G. § 5G1.2(d) means the sentence chosen by the district court “from the appropriate sentencing range” - and is not limited by the Guideline range.

The Ninth Circuit agreed to hear ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Green, No. Crim. No. 02-10054-WGY (D.Mass.) (346 F.Supp.2d 259) (June 18, 2004) (Judge William G. Young)
  2. U.S. v. Stephens, No. 02-14656 (11th Cir.) (365 F.3d 967) (April 6, 2004) (Judge Gerald B. Tjoflat)
  3. U.S. v. Iniguez, No. 01-50553 (9th Cir.) (368 F.3d 1113) (May 26, 2004) (Judge M. Margaret McKeown)
  4. Austin v. Wilkinson, No. 02-3429 (6th Cir.) (372 F.3d 346) (June 10, 2004) (Judge Karen Nelson Moore)
  5. Pliler v. Ford, No. 03-221 (U.S. Supreme Court) (542 U.S. 225; 124 S.Ct. 2441) (June 21, 2004) (Justice Thomas)
  6. Mataya v. Kingston, No. 02-2850 (7th Cir.) (371 F.3d 353) (June 3, 2004) (Judge Richard A. Posner)
  7. U.S. v. Hiruko, No. 03 CR 1124 (JG) (E.D.N.Y.) (320 F.Supp.2d 26) (June 9, 2004) (Judge John Gleeson)
  8. Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Ct. of Nevada, No. 03-5554 (U.S. Supreme Court) (542 U.S. 177; 124 S.Ct. 2451) (June 21, 2004) (Justice Kennedy)

More from these topics: