DeArmon v. Burgess, No. 01-3096 (8th Cir.) (388 F.3d 609) (November 8, 2004) (Judge Theodore McMillian)
In Andresen v. Maryland, 437 U.S. 463, 492 (1976), the Supreme Court explained why “general warrants” are “especially prohibited” by the Fourth Amendment: “The problem to be avoided is ‘not that of intrusion per se, but of a general, exploratory rummaging in a person's belongings.’ Thus the requirement plainly appearing ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login