Skip navigation

U.S. v. Bordon, No. 04-10654 (11th Cir.) (421 F.3d 1202) (August 25, 2005) (Per Curiam)

This decision is noted for Judge Hill's concurring opinion in which he railed against the Eleventh Circuit's exceptionally rigid policy of denying most Booker appeals. On that issue, he stated in part:

"In supplemental authority and at oral argument, the Bordons offered Booker as support that they were unlawfully sentenced. ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login