Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Garner, No. 4:01 CR 321 (N.D.Ohio) (2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18840) (August 31, 2005) (Judge David D. Jr. Dowd)

Loaded on Aug. 1, 2005 published in Punch and Jurists August 15, 2005
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Mandatory Minimums.

In this case, Judge Dowd examined whether "the [sentence-enhancing] 'fact' (quantity of cocaine attributable to the defendant) must be submitted to the jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt in a situation where the 'fact' results in a mandatory minimum sentence which exceeds the range calculated by the court in ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Belmontes v. Brown, No. 01-99018 (9th Cir.) (414 F.3d 1094) (July 15, 2005) (Judge Stephen Reinhardt)
  2. U.S. v. Padilla, No. 03-1918 (1st Cir.) (415 F.3d 211) (July 25, 2005) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
  3. U.S. v. Garner, No. 4:01 CR 321 (N.D.Ohio) (2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18840) (August 31, 2005) (Judge David D. Jr. Dowd)
  4. Padilla v. Hanft, No. 05-6396 (4th Cir.) (423 F.3d 386) (September 9, 2005) (Judge J. Michael Luttig)
  5. Enwonwu v. Chertoff, No. Civ.A. 05-10511-WGY (D.Mass.) (376 F.Supp.2d 42) (July 12, 2005) (Judge William G. Young)
  6. Doe v. Gonzales, No. 3:05-cv-1256 (JCH) (D.Conn.) (386 F.Supp.2d 66) (September 9, 2005) (Judge Janet C. Hall)

More from these topics: