U.S. v. Harju, No. 05-CR-97 (E.D.Wisc.) (384 F.Supp.2d 1278) (August 21, 2005) (Judge Lynn S. Adelman)
Loaded on Aug. 1, 2005
published in Punch and Jurists
August 22, 2005
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Probable Cause.
In the minds of the Framers of our Constitution, one of the principal purposes of the Fourth Amendment was to preclude "the petty tyranny of unregulated rummagers." (Amsterdam, “Perspectives on the Fourth Amendment,” (1974) 58 Minn. L.R. 349, 411). Sadly, for far too many judges, that noble purpose is no ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Kirby, No. 04-6226 (6th Cir.) (418 F.3d 621) (August 15, 2005) (Judge Julia Smith Gibbons)
- Lopez v. Gonzales, No. 04-2397 (8th Cir.) (417 F.3d 934) (August 9, 2005) (Judge Raymond W. Gruender)
- U.S. v. Scott, No. 04-10090 (9th Cir.) (424 F.3d 888) (September 9, 2005) (Judge Alex Kozinski)
- U.S. v. Coney, No. 4:05CR2001-2 (D.Neb.) (390 F.Supp.2d 844) (September 8, 2005) (Judge Richard G. Kopf)
- U.S. v. Burt, No. 04-10240 (9th Cir.) (410 F.3d 1100) (June 8, 2005) (Judge Myron H. Bright)
- U.S. v. Gianakos, No. 03-2989 (8th Cir.) (415 F.3d 912) (July 26, 2005) (Judge Lavenski R. Smith)
- U.S. v. Bussell, No. 02-50495 (9th Cir.) (414 F.3d 1048) (July 12, 2005) (Judge Richard R. Clifton)
- U.S. v. Harju, No. 05-CR-97 (E.D.Wisc.) (384 F.Supp.2d 1278) (August 21, 2005) (Judge Lynn S. Adelman)
- U.S. v. Young, No. 3:98-00038 (M.D.Tenn.) (376 F.Supp.2d 787) (April 22, 2005) (Judge John T. Nixon)
- U.S. v. Rivera, No. 04-5480-cr (2nd Cir.) (415 F.3d 284) (July 18, 2005) (Judge John M. Jr. Walker)
- U.S. v. Hall, No. 04-50193 (9th Cir.) (419 F.3d 980) (August 15, 2005) (Judge Kim McLane Wardlaw)
- U.S. v. Alvarado-Rivera, No. 03-2308 (8th Cir.) (412 F.3d 942) (June 20, 2005) (Judge Diana E. Murphy)
- U.S. v. Amaya-Portillo, No. 04-4672 (4th Cir.) (423 F.3d 427) (September 6, 2005) (Judge James C. Cacheris)
- U.S. v. Smith, No. 03-10548 (9th Cir.) (424 F.3d 992) (September 13, 2005) (Judge Michael Daly Hawkins)
- King v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, No. 03-2431 (7th Cir.) (415 F.3d 634) (July 13, 2005) (Judge Richard A. Posner)
- U.S. v. Chaudhry, No. 04-50421 (9th Cir.) (424 F.3d 1051) (September 14, 2005) (Judge Betty Binns Fletcher)
- U.S. v. Barnett, No. 04-3646 (7th Cir.) (415 F.3d 690) (July 18, 2005) (Judge Richard A. Posner)
More from these topics:
- Seventh Circuit Announces Procedures for Addressing ‘Facially Questionable Warrant’ Due to ‘Material Handwritten Alterations’ Unsigned or Initialed by Issuing Judge, Dec. 15, 2023. Search warrants, Warrants, Probable Cause, Material Falsehoods, Authorized Persons.
- Sixth Circuit Suppresses Evidence Obtained as a Result of Warrant That Lacked Probable Cause of Criminal Activity in Arson Investigation, Sept. 1, 2023. Probable Cause, Suppression.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
- U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc., No. 90-516 (U.S. Supreme Court) (500 U.S. 90; 111 S.Ct. 1711) (May 20, 1991) (Justice Marshall), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists.
- Trammel v. U.S., No. 78-5705 (U.S. Supreme Court) (445 U.S. 40; 100 S.Ct. 906) (February 27, 1980) (Justice Burger), Feb. 12, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to Assert.