Skip navigation

U.S. v. Wilson, No. 04-1918 (3rd Cir.) (413 F.3d 382) (July 1, 2005) (Judge Thomas L. Ambro)

This case is noted for Judge Aldisert’s spirited dissent in which he found “appalling” the Government’s “blatant judge shopping” which it accomplished by ignoring its own double jeopardy guidelines, known as the Petite Policy.

In this case, the Third Circuit explored in some depth the Department of Justice’s make-believe “Dual ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login