Skip navigation

U.S. v. Coffey, No. 04-2176 (8th Cir.) (415 F.3d 882) (July 25, 2005) (Judge Roger L. Wollman)

In this case, Coffey objected to the district court increasing his mandatory guidelines sentence on the basis of the evidence before it, asserting that it was insufficient to establish any drug quantity. This is precisely what Justice Stevens’s majority opinion in Booker found to be problematic with the guidelines: that ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login