U.S. v. Fagans, No. 04-4845-cr (2nd Cir.) (406 F.3d 138) (April 27, 2005) (Judge Jon O. Newman)
Loaded on Dec. 1, 2005
published in Punch and Jurists
April 11, 2005
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings.
In this case the Court addressed three specific Booker questions, namely: (1) whether to remand for resentencing, rather than for consideration of whether to resentence, where an objection to the compulsory use of the Sentencing Guidelines has been preserved for review; (2) whether, in some circumstances, to review the correctness ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Fagans, No. 04-4845-cr (2nd Cir.) (406 F.3d 138) (April 27, 2005) (Judge Jon O. Newman)
- Pace v. DiGuglielmo, No. 03-9627 (U.S. Supreme Court) (544 U.S. 408; 125 S.Ct. 1807) (April 27, 2005) (Justice Rehnquist)
- A.C.L.U. v. Department of Defense, No. 04 CIV. 4151 (AKH) (S.D.N.Y.) (357 F.Supp.2d 708) (February 28, 2005) (Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein)
- U.S. v. Locascio, No. 03 CR 304(CBA) (E.D.N.Y.) (357 F.Supp.2d 558) (February 2, 2005) (Judge Carol Bagley Amon)
- U.S. v. Pirani, No. 03-2971 (8th Cir.) (406 F.3d 543) (April 29, 2005) (Judge James B. Loken)
- U.S. v. Williams, No. 04-3175 (10th Cir.) (403 F.3d 1188) (April 15, 2005) (Judge Stephen H. Anderson)
- Pasquantino v. U.S., No. 03-725 (U.S. Supreme Court) (544 U.S. 349; 125 S.Ct. 1766) (April 26, 2005) (Justice Thomas)
- U.S. v. Davis, No. 02-4521 (3rd Cir.) (407 F.3d 162) (April 28, 2005) (Judge Anthony J. Scirica)
More from these topics:
- New Orleans Public Defender’s “Redeem Team” Says: “Re-entry Is Never Over”, May 1, 2025. Settlements, Wrongful Conviction, Life without Parole (LWOP), Juveniles, Post-release, ex-offender, re-entry, Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings.
- Second Circuit Holds Full De Novo Resentencing Hearing Required Based on Partially Successful Habeas Petition Where Resentencing Judge Not Original Judge and Changed Circumstances Plausibly Alleged, Dec. 1, 2024. Resentencing, De Novo Resentencing, Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings.
- Arizona Supreme Court Allows Third PCR Motion Based on IAC for Erroneous Advice About Parole Eligibility Due to ‘Pervasive Confusion’ Regarding Parole Within Legal Community, Nov. 1, 2024. Parole, Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings.
- Indiana Supreme Court Says “Summary Judgment Is Not Summary Trial,” Remanding State Prisoner’s Malpractice Claim to a Jury, Aug. 15, 2024. Malpractice (Attorneys), Summary Judgment, Resentencing, Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings.
- Louisiana Supreme Court Finds Prosecution Withheld Favorable Impeachment and Exculpatory Evidence in Violation of Brady, Aug. 1, 2024. Exculpatory No Doctrine, Resentencing, Evidence - Failure to Disclose, Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings.
- Ninth Circuit Announces District Courts Must Either Orally Pronounce All Discretionary ‘Standard’ Conditions of Supervised Release in the Presence of Defendant or Provide Conditions in Writing Prior to Sentencing, Feb. 15, 2024. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Applicable Guidelines Issues, Sentencing Hearing, Right to be Present, Conditions of, Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings.
- Ninth Circuit: Government’s Inflammatory Arguments in Sentencing Memorandum and at Sentencing Hearing Implicitly Breached Plea Agreement Promise Not to Recommend Sentence in Excess of Low-End Guidelines Range, June 15, 2023. War on Drugs, U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings, Validity of.
- Eleventh Circuit: District Court ‘Mischaracterizing’ Habeas Claim Left Claim Unresolved in Violation of Clisby, Requiring Remand, Jan. 15, 2021. Habeas Corpus, De Novo Resentencing, Remands/Rehearings/Resentencings.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.