Smith v. Massachusetts, No. 03-8661 (U.S. Supreme Court) (543 U.S. 462; 125 S.Ct. 1129) (February 22, 2005) (Justice Scalia)
In a decision that is highly fact-specific and that will have extremely limited precedential value, the Supreme Court held that Double Jeopardy principles barred a trial judge, after granting a motion finding insufficient evidence supported a gun count against a defendant when the prosecution rested its case, from changing his ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login