Skip navigation

U.S. v. Fell, No. 2:01-CR-12-01 (D.Vt.) (372 F.Supp.2d 786) (June 9, 2005) (Judge William K. III Sessions)

Defendant, who was on trial for capital murder, challenged a juror for cause, arguing that the juror was not able to fairly consider certain kinds of mitigating evidence and impartially weigh expert testimony from psychiatrists or psychologists.

Although the juror expressed moderate and balanced views on the death penalty, he ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login