Gonzalez v. Crosby, No. 04-6432 (U.S. Supreme Court) (545 U.S. 524; 125 S.Ct. 2641) (June 23, 2005) (Justice Scalia)
In habeas proceedings, a motion for relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) is not to be treated as a successive habeas petition if it does not assert, or reassert, claims of error in the movant's state conviction.
This is one of those “ugh” and “shrug” cases could accurately ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login