Skip navigation

Gonzalez v. Crosby, No. 04-6432 (U.S. Supreme Court) (545 U.S. 524; 125 S.Ct. 2641) (June 23, 2005) (Justice Scalia)

In habeas proceedings, a motion for relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) is not to be treated as a successive habeas petition if it does not assert, or reassert, claims of error in the movant's state conviction.

This is one of those “ugh” and “shrug” cases could accurately …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login