Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

Mayle v. Felix, No. 04-563 (U.S. Supreme Court) (545 U.S. 644; 125 S.Ct. 2562) (June 23, 2005) (Justice Ginsburg)

Loaded on June 1, 2005 published in Punch and Jurists June 06, 2005
Filed under: Punch And Jurists.

In his dissent, Justice summarized the import of this case by stating that it required the Court “to decide how the relation back provision of Rule 15(c)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ought to apply in federal habeas corpus cases, when neither text nor precedent provides clear guidance.” ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Rompilla v. Beard, No. 04-5462 (U.S. Supreme Court) (545 U.S. 374; 125 S.Ct. 2456) (June 20, 2005) (Justice Souter)
  2. U.S. v. Borer, No. 03-2903 (8th Cir.) (412 F.3d 987) (June 22, 2005) (Judge Steven M. Colloton)
  3. U.S. v. Patterson, No. 00-30306 (9th Cir.) (406 F.3d 1095) (May 6, 2005) (Judge John T. Jr. Noonan)
  4. Dodd v. U.S., No. 04-5286 (U.S. Supreme Court) (545 U.S. 353; 125 S.Ct. 2478) (June 20, 2005) (Justice O'Connor)
  5. Halbert v. Michigan, No. 03-10198 (U.S. Supreme Court) (545 U.S. 605; 125 S.Ct. 2582) (June 23, 2005) (Justice Ginsburg)
  6. Mayle v. Felix, No. 04-563 (U.S. Supreme Court) (545 U.S. 644; 125 S.Ct. 2562) (June 23, 2005) (Justice Ginsburg)
  7. Bradshaw v. Stumpf, No. 04-637 (U.S. Supreme Court) (545 U.S. 175; 125 S.Ct. 2398) (June 13, 2005) (Justice O'Connor)

More from these topics: