Skip navigation

Rompilla v. Beard, No. 04-5462 (U.S. Supreme Court) (545 U.S. 374; 125 S.Ct. 2456) (June 20, 2005) (Justice Souter)

Here the Court held, by a 5-to-4 vote, that even when a capital defendant himself has suggested that no mitigating evidence is available, his lawyer is bound to make reasonable efforts to obtain material he knows the prosecutor will rely on.

In 1988, a Pennsylvania state jury convicted Ronald Rompilla ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login