Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Borer, No. 03-2903 (8th Cir.) (412 F.3d 987) (June 22, 2005) (Judge Steven M. Colloton)

Loaded on June 1, 2005 published in Punch and Jurists June 06, 2005
Filed under: Punch And Jurists.

In this case, the court rejected the Government's argument that the defendant was ineligible for a three-level acceptance of responsibility reduction under ยง 3E1.1(b) because the PROTECT Act (which was passed after the defendant's offense) added a government motion requirement for the third-level reduction. And in so doing, the Eighth ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Rompilla v. Beard, No. 04-5462 (U.S. Supreme Court) (545 U.S. 374; 125 S.Ct. 2456) (June 20, 2005) (Justice Souter)
  2. U.S. v. Borer, No. 03-2903 (8th Cir.) (412 F.3d 987) (June 22, 2005) (Judge Steven M. Colloton)
  3. U.S. v. Patterson, No. 00-30306 (9th Cir.) (406 F.3d 1095) (May 6, 2005) (Judge John T. Jr. Noonan)
  4. Dodd v. U.S., No. 04-5286 (U.S. Supreme Court) (545 U.S. 353; 125 S.Ct. 2478) (June 20, 2005) (Justice O'Connor)
  5. Halbert v. Michigan, No. 03-10198 (U.S. Supreme Court) (545 U.S. 605; 125 S.Ct. 2582) (June 23, 2005) (Justice Ginsburg)
  6. Mayle v. Felix, No. 04-563 (U.S. Supreme Court) (545 U.S. 644; 125 S.Ct. 2562) (June 23, 2005) (Justice Ginsburg)
  7. Bradshaw v. Stumpf, No. 04-637 (U.S. Supreme Court) (545 U.S. 175; 125 S.Ct. 2398) (June 13, 2005) (Justice O'Connor)

More from these topics: