Skip navigation

U.S. v. Cabrera, No. 03-1890 (1st Cir.) (145 Fed. Appx. 373) (June 14, 2005) (Per Curiam)

In this case the defendant/appellant argued that the district court had erred by not holding an evidentiary hearing at the time of sentencing regarding the issue of drug quantity. That argument evoked the following rather surly response from the panel:

“We do not agree: evidentiary hearings at sentencing are the ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login