Abdul-Malik v. Hawk-Sawyer, No. 04-3877-pr (2nd Cir.) (403 F.3d 72) (April 5, 2005) (Judge Dennis G. Jacobs)
Loaded on March 1, 2005
published in Punch and Jurists
March 14, 2005
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences.
In a blunt assessment of the confused and confusing state of sentencing of defendants who are serving both a federal and a state term of imprisonment, Judge Jacobs called the situation both “worrisome” and “unresolved.” In fact, so concerned was he by the absence of any coherent and rational policy ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Guzman v. U.S., No. 03-2446-pr (2nd Cir.) (404 F.3d 139) (April 8, 2005) (Judge Dennis G. Jacobs)
- U.S. v. Johnson, No. CR 01-3046-MWB (N.D.Iowa) (354 F.Supp.2d 939) (January 3, 2005) (Judge Mark W. Bennett)
- Abdul-Malik v. Hawk-Sawyer, No. 04-3877-pr (2nd Cir.) (403 F.3d 72) (April 5, 2005) (Judge Dennis G. Jacobs)
- U.S. v. McDaniel, No. 03-1940 (6th Cir.) (398 F.3d 540) (February 17, 2005) (Judge Karen Nelson Moore)
- U.S. v. Titterington, No. Crim. No. 02-20165 (W.D.Tenn.) (354 F.Supp.2d 778) (February 3, 2005) (Judge Bernice B. Donald)
- U.S. v. Smith, No. 03-13639 (11th Cir.) (402 F.3d 1303) (March 18, 2005) (Judge Gerald B. Tjoflat)
- U.S. v. McGilvery, No. 04-1013 (6th Cir.) (403 F.3d 361) (April 5, 2005) (Judge Dan Aaron Polster)
- Johnson v. U.S., No. 03-9685 (U.S. Supreme Court) (544 U.S. 295; 125 S.Ct. 1571) (April 4, 2005) (Justice Souter)
- U.S. v. Coles, No. 03-3113 (D.C. Cir.) (403 F.3d 764) (April 8, 2005) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Dunmire, No. 04-3002 (10th Cir.) (403 F.3d 722) (April 5, 2005) (Judge Monroe G. McKay)
- U.S. v. Hanhardt, No. 00 CR 853-1 (N.D.Ill.) (353 F.Supp.2d 957) (December 7, 2004) (Judge Charles R. Sr. Norgle)
- U.S. v. Gonzalez-Huerta, No. 04-2045 (10th Cir.) (403 F.3d 727) (April 8, 2005) (Judge Deanell R. Tacha)
- Hayes v. Brown, No. 99-99030 (9th Cir.) (399 F.3d 972) (March 7, 2005) (Judge Sidney R. Thomas)
- Murillo v. Frank, No. 04-2202 (7th Cir.) (402 F.3d 786) (April 1, 2005) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook)
More from these topics:
- Washington Supreme Court: Nonexceptional Consecutive Terms of ‘Community Custody’ May Not Exceed Aggregate Term of 24 Months, May 15, 2024. Parole, Probation, Parole & Supervised Release, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences, Multiple Sentences, Aggregate Sentence.
- Sixth Circuit: Sentence Procedurally Unreasonable Where District Court Failed to Explain Decision to Impose Consecutive Sentences and Substantively Unreasonable Where Court Improperly Weighed Sentencing Factors, Oct. 1, 2023. Failure to Explain Consequences, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences, Impermissible Factors.
- Supreme Court of California: After Amendments to Three Strikes Law, Courts Retain Concurrent Sentencing Discretion for Qualifying Offenses Committed on Same Occasion or Arising From Same Operative Facts, Sept. 1, 2023. Three Strikes, Three Strikes Statutes/Rule, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences.
- SCOTUS Announces § 924(c)(1)(D)(ii)’s Consecutive Sentence Mandate Not Applicable to § 924(j) Sentences, Aug. 1, 2023. Murder/Felony Murder, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences.
- Hawaii Supreme Court Rules That Time Served for Concurrent Sentences Can Be Counted Only Once for Sentence Credit, April 24, 2023. Credits, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences.
- Montana Supreme Court Grants State Prisoner 604 Days in Sentence Credit, April 1, 2023. Credits, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences.
- Fifth Circuit: Consecutive Sentence for FTA Must Be Part of ‘Total Punishment,’ Not Merely a Stacked Sentence, Nov. 15, 2020. Total Punishment, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences.
- Michigan Supreme Court Announces Court Must Inform Defendant of Consecutive Sentencing Authority When Accepting Plea, July 15, 2020. Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences, Plea Agreements/Guilty Pleas.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.