Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

Doe v. Moore, No. 04-10279 (11th Cir.) (410 F.3d 1337) (June 6, 2005) (Judge Stanley F. Jr. Birch)

Loaded on May 1, 2005 published in Punch and Jurists May 23, 2005
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Megan's Laws.

Here the Court rejected a broad series of constitutional challenges to Florida’s Sex Offender Registration/Notification statutes and its DNA Collection statutes, stating that any liberty interest rights they affected were not deeply rooted in history.

In this class action lawsuit, the Eleventh Circuit rejected a broad series of constitutional challenges ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Gonzales v. Raich, No. 03-1454 (U.S. Supreme Court) (545 U.S. 1; 125 S.Ct. 2195) (June 6, 2005) (Justice Stevens)
  2. U.S. v. Clawson, No. 03-3910 (8th Cir.) (408 F.3d 556) (May 31, 2005) (Judge C. Arlen Beam)
  3. Doe v. Moore, No. 04-10279 (11th Cir.) (410 F.3d 1337) (June 6, 2005) (Judge Stanley F. Jr. Birch)
  4. U.S. v. Lauder, No. 04-2120 (10th Cir.) (409 F.3d 1254) (June 8, 2005) (Judge Timothy M. Tymkovich)
  5. U.S. v. Grover, No. 1;04CR00175-PGC (D.Utah) (364 F.Supp.2d 1298) (April 12, 2005) (Judge Paul G. Cassell)
  6. U.S. v. Gust, No. 04-30208 (9th Cir.) (403 F.3d 797) (April 26, 2005) (Judge Ronald M. Gould)
  7. U.S. v. Dalton, No. 04-7043 (10th Cir.) (409 F.3d 1247) (June 2, 2005) (Judge Stephen H. Anderson)

More from these topics: