Skip navigation

Pace v. DiGuglielmo, No. 03-9627 (U.S. Supreme Court) (544 U.S. 408; 125 S.Ct. 1807) (April 27, 2005) (Justice Rehnquist)

Here the Court held that a state post-conviction motion is not "properly filed," within the meaning of the tolling provision of the AEDPA’s statute of limitations, when that motion was denied by the state courts for being untimely under state law. The Court distinguished Artuz v. Bennett, 531 U.S. 4 ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login