U.S. v. Martinez-Flores, No. 04-2861 (1st Cir.) (428 F.3d 22) (October 28, 2005) (Judge Sandra L. Lynch)
Loaded on Nov. 1, 2005
published in Punch and Jurists
December 05, 2005
Filed under:
Punch And Jurists,
Fast Track Programs.
Here the Court held that provisions of the Feeney Amendment allowing for fast-track sentencing did not create a constitutionally improper impled delegation of congressional power to the Attorney General.
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Lister, No. 04-4304 (7th Cir.) (432 F.3d 754) (December 28, 2005) (Judge William J. Bauer)
- U.S. v. Southwell, No. 04-30521 (9th Cir.) (432 F.3d 1060) (December 30, 2005) (Judge Alex Kozinski)
- U.S. v. Cardwell, No. 03-4585 (4th Cir.) (433 F.3d 378) (December 30, 2005) (Judge Karen J. Williams)
- U.S. v. Ladwig, No. 04-30393 (9th Cir.) (432 F.3d 1001) (December 27, 2005) (Judge Ronald M. Gould)
- U.S. v. Bowers, No. 05-4908 (3rd Cir.) (432 F.3d 518) (December 27, 2005) (Judge Edward R. Becker)
- Bernitt v. Martinez, No. 05-2508 (8th Cir.) (432 F.3d 868) (December 28, 2005) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Talley, No. 05-11353 (11th Cir.) (431 F.3d 784) (December 2, 2005) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Menyweather, No. 03-50496 (9th Cir.) (431 F.3d 692) (December 16, 2005) (Judge Susan P. Graber)
- U.S. v. Stone, No. 04-6184 (6th Cir.) (432 F.3d 651) (December 23, 2005) (Judge Cornelia G. Kennedy)
- U.S. v. Stone, No. 04-6184 (6th Cir.) (432 F.3d 651) (December 23, 2005) (Judge Cornelia G. Kennedy)
- U.S. v. Baker, No. 00-13083 (11th Cir.) (432 F.3d 1189) (December 13, 2005) (Judge Rosemary Barkett)
- Padilla v. Hanft, No. 05-6396 (4th Cir.) (432 F.3d 582) (December 21, 2005) (Judge J. Michael Luttig)
- U.S. v. Davis, No. 04-50030 (9th Cir.) (428 F.3d 802) (November 2, 2005) (Judge Charles R. Breyer)
- U.S. v. Hankton, No. 03-2345 (7th Cir.) (432 F.3d 779) (December 29, 2005) (Judge John L. Coffey)
- U.S. v. Martinez-Flores, No. 04-2861 (1st Cir.) (428 F.3d 22) (October 28, 2005) (Judge Sandra L. Lynch)
More from these topics:
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.
- Russello v. U.S., No. 82-472 (U.S. Supreme Court) (464 U.S. 16; 104 S.Ct. 296) (November 1, 1983) (Justice Blackmun), March 27, 2019. Forfeiture, Punch And Jurists.
- Silverman v. U.S., No. 66 (U.S. Supreme Court) (365 U.S. 505; 81 S.Ct. 679) (March 6, 2061) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Unlawful Entry/Conduct.
- Rhodes v. Chapman, No. 80-332 (U.S. Supreme Court) (452 U.S. 337; 101 S.Ct. 2392) (June 15, 1981) (Justice Powell), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Prison Conditions.
- U.S. v. Kahn, No. 72-1328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (415 U.S. 143; 94 S.Ct. 977) (February 20, 1974) (Justice Stewart), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Necessity.
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc., No. 90-516 (U.S. Supreme Court) (500 U.S. 90; 111 S.Ct. 1711) (May 20, 1991) (Justice Marshall), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists.
- Trammel v. U.S., No. 78-5705 (U.S. Supreme Court) (445 U.S. 40; 100 S.Ct. 906) (February 27, 1980) (Justice Burger), Feb. 12, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to Assert.
- U.S. v. Miles, No. `8-1172 (10th Cir.) (902 F.3d 1159) (August 29, 2028) (Per Curiam), Jan. 1, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Mutuality.
- U.S. v. Pineda-Mateo, No. 17-1857 (1st Cir.) (905 F.3d 13) (September 18, 2018) (Judge Juan R. Torruella), Jan. 1, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Joint Participant.