Skip navigation

U.S. v. Cunningham, No. 05-1774 (7th Cir.) (429 F.3d 673) (November 14, 2005) (Judge Richard A. Posner)

In this extremely opaque decision, the Court reversed a 57-month sentence that was at the bottom of the applicable guideline range because the record below "left in serious doubt whether the [sentencing] judge connected the facts relating to the statutory factors to the sentence he imposed." Here is the concluding ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login