Skip navigation

U.S. v. Jimenez, No. 04-51225 (5th Cir.) (464 F.3d 555) (September 12, 2006) (Judge Carl E. Stewart)

This is an interesting Confrontation Clause decision that explores whether a defendant’s Confrontation Clause rights were violated when the district court limited the cross-examination of a police officer/material witness about the details of his surveillance of the defendant on the grounds that such testimony was protected because it involved “police …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login