Skip navigation

U.S. v. Jimenez, No. 04-51225 (5th Cir.) (464 F.3d 555) (September 12, 2006) (Judge Carl E. Stewart)

This is an interesting Confrontation Clause decision that explores whether a defendant’s Confrontation Clause rights were violated when the district court limited the cross-examination of a police officer/material witness about the details of his surveillance of the defendant on the grounds that such testimony was protected because it involved “police ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login