Skip navigation

Dickson v. Quarterman, No. 05-70032 (5th Cir.) (462 F.3d 470) (August 24, 2006) (Judge Emilio M. Garza)

Here the Court first rejected a habeas petition based on a Brady violation (that the trial court said was sufficiently serious to warrant a new trial) - and then gave a long sermon telling prosecutors how important it is to comply with Brady.

It is certainly not surprising to see ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login